- Mednick, Mordy
- Industry Alerts
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Suppose you were a tenant paying $2,000 a month in lease payments under a leasing agreement with your landlord. The landlord approaches you and states that construction will be taking place over the next month. He gives you the option to leave the premises or pay a reduced fee of $500 while the construction is in effect. You agree to remain at the premises and pay the landlord the reduced fee without confirming anything in writing.
Given that construction will only be for one month, you decide not to inconvenience yourself and amend the payment terms in your leasing agreement. You pay the landlord $500. Subsequently, after the construction is completed, the landlord claims that you are still indebted to him for $1,500 since the leasing agreement requires you to pay $2,000 per month in rent.
Is the landlord entitled to collect these funds?
Estoppel is a legal term that often arises but is little understood. Effectively, it means that a court may prevent or “estop” a person from asserting a particular position in law where it would be inequitable or unfair to do so. While there are many different types of estoppel, the most common type is “promissory estoppel. ” To establish promissory estoppel, the following three criteria must be established:
- Where Party 1 has, by his words or conduct, made to Party 2 a clear and unequivocal promise or assurance which was intended to affect the legal relations between them;
- Party 2 has taken him at his word and acted on it to his detriment; and
- Party 1 who gave the promise or assurance cannot afterward be allowed to revert to his previous legal relations as if no such promise or assurance has been made by him.
Based on the facts I’ve outlined above, you, as the tenant, would be able to rely on promissory estoppel and only pay the landlord $500. Specifically, because the landlord assured you that rent would only be $500 and you took the landlord at his word and stayed at the premises based on this assurance, the landlord cannot now revert to his previous legal position and demand payment of $2,000 under the leasing agreement.
This example is but one of many examples in which promissory estoppel can arise.
- Industry Alerts Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 2, Number 6: The Litigation Process in Ontario
- Industry Alerts Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 2, Number 5: Bad Reviews - Defamation or Not?
- Industry Alerts Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 2, Number 4: Identity Theft
- September 30, 2022 In the News Benjamin Sobczak Elected to State Bar of Michigan’s Cannabis Law Section Council
- September 30, 2022 In the News Two Dickinson Wright Lawyers Recognized in the 2023 Edition of Chambers Canada
- September 27, 2022 In the News Dickinson Wright Ranked in Benchmark Litigation Labor & Employment 2022 Edition
- September 26, 2022 Blogs 移民局、コロナ禍の署名方針を恒久化へ | USCIS Makes Covid-19 Signature Policy Permanent
- September 26, 2022 Industry Alerts TTAB's Precedential Opinion in In re County of Orange Affirms Refusal of Registering Orange County's Unofficial Insignia
- September 23, 2022 In the News Caleb Green Recognized by the Washington Bar Association and National Bar Association as a 2022 Power 100 Honoree