Daniel Quick’s article, “Tortious Interference: New Developments for an Important Business Tort,” was published in the State Bar of Michigan’s Litigation Journal.
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Daniel Quick’s article, “Tortious Interference: New Developments for an Important Business Tort,” was published in the State Bar of Michigan’s Litigation Journal. His article discusses changes to this important business tort nationally and in the latest Restatement, including whether interference with contract and interference with economic expectation are considered two separate torts, how a party’s conduct is judged as being improper or wrongful, and how tortious interference applies to contracts terminable at will. “As litigators plead or defend these claims, they may be well-served to review the Third Restatement and consider whether a good faith argument may be made to the court for a ruling that, perhaps not supported clearly be existing case law, is consistent with the Third Restatement and the tort’s underlying policy goals. After all, the common law is designed to evolve,” Daniel says. To read more, click here.
Contacts
