Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 4: Deposits for Home Purchases
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
April Focus
Deposits for Home Purchases
Whether you’re an owner selling your residence, or a buyer purchasing a residence, deposits are required. The deposit gives the vendor some measure of security in case of default by the buyer.
But what happens if a real estate transaction goes sideways? How does a party retrieve the deposit? The answer to this question is not as simple as it seems.
Retrieving the Deposit
Deposits are usually held by one of the party’s real estate agents, in trust. This means that unless there is a resolution between the parties or a court order, the real estate agent cannot release the funds under any circumstance. For example, suppose a vendor claims entitlement to a $100,000 deposit because of default by the buyer. The vendor cannot simply ask the real estate agent to release the funds from trust. Instead, the vendor must bring a court application unless the buyer consents to the release of the funds. However, given that litigation is expensive, often both parties will try to work out an arrangement in order to avoid expensive legal fees.
Settlement Is Usually Preferable
In Ontario, a successful party is generally only entitled to receive 60% of his legal costs from the other party. Thus, if a party incurs legal fees of $50,000 and was successful at court, the party who was unsuccessful at court would be responsible to pay the successful party $30,000, representing 60% of the $50,0000 incurred. Looking at it another way, the successful party will still have to pay $20,000 of his $50,000 legal expenses. Therefore, if a buyer defaults on his obligations under the contract, as in my example above, I would typically recommend the vendor to try and settle with the buyer for a minor amount to avoid the legal fees that would otherwise be lost. This would also allow the vendor to retrieve the funds much sooner than if he proceeded by way of a court application.
While I am hopeful that you will never find yourself in this spot, disputes arise often. It is important to know your options when things go off track so you can make the most of a difficult situation.
Wishing everyone is safe and healthy during these trying times.
Recent Insights
- February 4, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Earns Eighth Consecutive 100 Score in Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s 2026 Corporate Equality Index
- February 03, 2026 Media Mentions The Inter-American Dialogue’s Latin American Advisor quoted Mark High in the article, “How Will the USMCA Trade Talks Play Out This Year?”
- February 2, 2026 In the News Scott MacDonald and Nicholas Marler Join Dickinson Wright Seattle Office
- February 2, 2026 In the News Aleanna Siacon Named to Michigan Lawyers Weekly 2026 Up and Coming Lawyers
- February 02, 2026 Media Mentions Mark Shapiro recently spoke at a Toronto Maple Leafs press conference alongside Darryl Sittler.
- February 02, 2026 Blogs Just Another NDA? Why M&A Confidentiality Agreements Are Different
- January 29, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Ranked in the 2026 Edition of the WTR 1000
- January 28, 2026 Blogs A Smart Way to Plan for High State Income Taxes: The Nevada ING Trust
- January 27, 2026 Industry Alerts Colorado Bankruptcy Court Pushes Back on Chapter 11 Filings by Solvent Debtors