Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 4: Deposits for Home Purchases
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
April Focus
Deposits for Home Purchases
Whether you’re an owner selling your residence, or a buyer purchasing a residence, deposits are required. The deposit gives the vendor some measure of security in case of default by the buyer.
But what happens if a real estate transaction goes sideways? How does a party retrieve the deposit? The answer to this question is not as simple as it seems.
Retrieving the Deposit
Deposits are usually held by one of the party’s real estate agents, in trust. This means that unless there is a resolution between the parties or a court order, the real estate agent cannot release the funds under any circumstance. For example, suppose a vendor claims entitlement to a $100,000 deposit because of default by the buyer. The vendor cannot simply ask the real estate agent to release the funds from trust. Instead, the vendor must bring a court application unless the buyer consents to the release of the funds. However, given that litigation is expensive, often both parties will try to work out an arrangement in order to avoid expensive legal fees.
Settlement Is Usually Preferable
In Ontario, a successful party is generally only entitled to receive 60% of his legal costs from the other party. Thus, if a party incurs legal fees of $50,000 and was successful at court, the party who was unsuccessful at court would be responsible to pay the successful party $30,000, representing 60% of the $50,0000 incurred. Looking at it another way, the successful party will still have to pay $20,000 of his $50,000 legal expenses. Therefore, if a buyer defaults on his obligations under the contract, as in my example above, I would typically recommend the vendor to try and settle with the buyer for a minor amount to avoid the legal fees that would otherwise be lost. This would also allow the vendor to retrieve the funds much sooner than if he proceeded by way of a court application.
While I am hopeful that you will never find yourself in this spot, disputes arise often. It is important to know your options when things go off track so you can make the most of a difficult situation.
Wishing everyone is safe and healthy during these trying times.
Recent Insights
- May 6, 2026 In the News Victoria Padula Joins Dickinson Wright Troy Office
- May 6, 2026 In the News Mark H. Evans Joins Dickinson Wright Toronto Office
- May 05, 2026 Blogs Fraud vs. Contract Claims: The Risk of Stopping Your Analysis Too Soon
- May 01, 2026 Industry Alerts DEA Final Order Creates Federal Pathway for Medical Marijuana
- May 01, 2026 Media Mentions Tripp Lake was quoted in an Information Week article, “Outsourcing contracts weren't built for AI. CIOs are renegotiating now."
- May 01, 2026 In the News Tripp Lake was recently featured in a Law Week Colorado Q&A article titled "5 questions with Tripp Lake at Dickinson Wright."
- April 30, 2026 Media Mentions Andrew Alvarado was recently quoted in a Houston Public Media article, “State hemp rules are currently blocked. A court will soon decide whether to extend the ban.”
- April 29, 2026 Blogs Section 168(n): A New Opportunity for Expensing Qualified Production Property
- April 28, 2026 Media Mentions Katherine VanderVeen was recently featured in a Law Week Colorado Q&A article titled "5 Questions with Katherine VanderVeen at Dickinson Wright."