Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 4: Deposits for Home Purchases
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
April Focus
Deposits for Home Purchases
Whether you’re an owner selling your residence, or a buyer purchasing a residence, deposits are required. The deposit gives the vendor some measure of security in case of default by the buyer.
But what happens if a real estate transaction goes sideways? How does a party retrieve the deposit? The answer to this question is not as simple as it seems.
Retrieving the Deposit
Deposits are usually held by one of the party’s real estate agents, in trust. This means that unless there is a resolution between the parties or a court order, the real estate agent cannot release the funds under any circumstance. For example, suppose a vendor claims entitlement to a $100,000 deposit because of default by the buyer. The vendor cannot simply ask the real estate agent to release the funds from trust. Instead, the vendor must bring a court application unless the buyer consents to the release of the funds. However, given that litigation is expensive, often both parties will try to work out an arrangement in order to avoid expensive legal fees.
Settlement Is Usually Preferable
In Ontario, a successful party is generally only entitled to receive 60% of his legal costs from the other party. Thus, if a party incurs legal fees of $50,000 and was successful at court, the party who was unsuccessful at court would be responsible to pay the successful party $30,000, representing 60% of the $50,0000 incurred. Looking at it another way, the successful party will still have to pay $20,000 of his $50,000 legal expenses. Therefore, if a buyer defaults on his obligations under the contract, as in my example above, I would typically recommend the vendor to try and settle with the buyer for a minor amount to avoid the legal fees that would otherwise be lost. This would also allow the vendor to retrieve the funds much sooner than if he proceeded by way of a court application.
While I am hopeful that you will never find yourself in this spot, disputes arise often. It is important to know your options when things go off track so you can make the most of a difficult situation.
Wishing everyone is safe and healthy during these trying times.
Recent Insights
- August 21, 2025 In the News 220 Dickinson Wright Attorneys Ranked in Best Lawyers in America®, Lawyer of the Year, and Ones to Watch 2026 Editions
- August 21, 2025 Industry Alerts One Big Beautiful Bill Act Expands QSBS Tax Incentives for Small Business Investment
- August 20, 2025 Industry Alerts Ohio Department of Development Updates QEP PILOT Construction Reporting Process
- August 19, 2025 In the News Forty-Five Dickinson Wright Attorneys Named 2025 Michigan Super Lawyers, 19 Named Rising Stars
- August 18, 2025 Articles Sixth Circuit Raises Bar for Employer Liability for Customer Harassment of Employees
- August 18, 2025 Media Mentions Rachel Schaffer Lawson and Stephen Montgomery were recently quoted in a BevNet article titled “Judge Considers Receivership for Uncle Nearest Whiskey Amid $100M Loan Default.”
- August 15, 2025 Media Mentions Benjamin Sobczak was quoted in the Crain’s Detroit Business article, “Dozens of Michigan weed companies are dropping out.”
- August 14, 2025 Articles Amazon Strengthens Brand Protection for Trademark Owners: Key Updates in 2025
- August 14, 2025 In the News Jing Liu, Matthew Powell, and Michael Spink Listed in the 2025 Edition of the IAM Strategy 300