Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 4: Deposits for Home Purchases
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
April Focus
Deposits for Home Purchases
Whether you’re an owner selling your residence, or a buyer purchasing a residence, deposits are required. The deposit gives the vendor some measure of security in case of default by the buyer.
But what happens if a real estate transaction goes sideways? How does a party retrieve the deposit? The answer to this question is not as simple as it seems.
Retrieving the Deposit
Deposits are usually held by one of the party’s real estate agents, in trust. This means that unless there is a resolution between the parties or a court order, the real estate agent cannot release the funds under any circumstance. For example, suppose a vendor claims entitlement to a $100,000 deposit because of default by the buyer. The vendor cannot simply ask the real estate agent to release the funds from trust. Instead, the vendor must bring a court application unless the buyer consents to the release of the funds. However, given that litigation is expensive, often both parties will try to work out an arrangement in order to avoid expensive legal fees.
Settlement Is Usually Preferable
In Ontario, a successful party is generally only entitled to receive 60% of his legal costs from the other party. Thus, if a party incurs legal fees of $50,000 and was successful at court, the party who was unsuccessful at court would be responsible to pay the successful party $30,000, representing 60% of the $50,0000 incurred. Looking at it another way, the successful party will still have to pay $20,000 of his $50,000 legal expenses. Therefore, if a buyer defaults on his obligations under the contract, as in my example above, I would typically recommend the vendor to try and settle with the buyer for a minor amount to avoid the legal fees that would otherwise be lost. This would also allow the vendor to retrieve the funds much sooner than if he proceeded by way of a court application.
While I am hopeful that you will never find yourself in this spot, disputes arise often. It is important to know your options when things go off track so you can make the most of a difficult situation.
Wishing everyone is safe and healthy during these trying times.
Recent Insights
- July 25, 2024 In the News Anita Rocha Joins Dickinson Wright Phoenix Office
- July 25, 2024 Podcasts DW FastTrack Episode 10: "Generative AI: Look Before You Jump" with Lance Anderson and Lael Andara
- July 24, 2024 Media Mentions Peggy Kozal recently quoted in the Fierce Healthcare article, “Supreme Court overrules Chevron deference, dealing blow to federal healthcare agencies."
- July 23, 2024 In the News Business Facilities recently published Jeremy Schirra's article, "The Last Word: A Look At Incentives."
- July 19, 2024 In the News Don’t miss out on Suzanne Sukkar and Najah Allaham’s article, “H-2B Visas as Quality Solution for Hospitality: Improve Customer Service With a Fully Staffed Team,” which was published by Hotel Online.
- July 18, 2024 In the News Nicholas Hall Joins Dickinson Wright Lexington Office
- July 18, 2024 In the News Dickinson Wright Receives Top Rankings in Chambers 2024 High Net Worth Guide
- July 18, 2024 In the News Michael Vogt's article, "Michigan’s New Clean Energy Siting Law Surges Ahead," was published by the State Bar of Michigan Real Property Law Section eNewsletter.
- July 16, 2024 Industry Alerts AI in Political Advertising