Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 3: COVID-19
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
March Focus
COVID-19
With all that is going on in the world, I wanted to provide you with a few key things to keep in mind regarding employers and employees.
As an employer, it is your duty to ensure that the workplace is safe. Although most businesses have been shutting down, the law as it currently stands does not prevent all businesses in Ontario from continuing to operate. Therefore, if you are continuing to operate, please keep the following in mind as an employer:
- Require employees returning from a high-risk area to immediately report such travel as well as any symptoms. Require such employees to work remotely for 14 days and only return once cleared by a medical professional.
- While layoffs are unfortunate and sad, be careful not to trigger constructive dismissals (i.e., making a substantial change to the terms of the employee’s contract without the employee’s consent, the employee has the option of treating his employment as having been terminated).
- Take the appropriate steps to ensure privacy of medical and health information.
- Consider that employees with a legitimate health and safety work refusal cannot be disciplined or dismissed.
Of late, the question that keeps arising is what happens if an employee refuses to attend the workplace because he fears that it poses a danger to his health and safety, even though the employee is not sick?
For starters, this situation is unprecedented. The legislation with the most applicability to the current situation is the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“the Act”). Under the Act, an employee can refuse to work if he believes the workplace poses a danger to his health or safety. Occupational illness is defined as a condition that results from exposure in a workplace to a physical, chemical, or biological agent to the extent that the normal physiological mechanisms are affected and the health of the worker is impaired. Occupational illness might include exposure to disease-causing bacteria and viruses, for example, or to chemicals or dust.
Until now, we are unaware of any worker who has attempted to rely on the Act as a basis for refusing to attend work because of COVID-19. However, with the current predicament changing rapidly, it won’t be long before this argument is made to the Courts on an urgent basis.
Recent Insights
- June 25, 2026 In the News Osie Ukwuoma Joins Dickinson Wright Toronto Office as a Partner
- June 23, 2026 Media Mentions Trent Cornell and Andrew Eres were recently quoted in the Chicago Lawyer article, "Expanding its Horizon."
- June 19, 2026 Media Mentions Hector Agdeppa was recently quoted in a Law360 article, “One And Done? Patent Examiner Interviews Now Hard To Get.”
- June 18, 2026 In the News John Desmond, Alexis Taitel, Alice Samberg, Mackenzie Robinson, and Peter Dragovich co-authored the “Law & Practice” article in the USA 2026 Dispute Resolution Practice Guide by Chambers & Partners.
- June 17, 2026 Industry Alerts The Next Platform Shift Is Wearable. Is Your Privacy Program Ready?
- June 16, 2026 Industry Alerts Ohio Opens Nomination Window for Opportunity Zones 2.0 Designations
- June 16, 2026 In the News John Desmond, Alexis Taitel, and Alice Samberg co-authored the “Trends & Developments” article in the USA 2026 Dispute Resolution Practice Guide by Chambers & Partners.
- June 15, 2026 In the News Andrea Arndt’s article, “Copyrights on YouTube: Enforcement and Reality,” was recently published in Inventors Digest.
- June 12, 2026 Industry Alerts USTR Proposes New Section 301 Tariffs for Forced Labor Enforcement