Attorney John S. Artz Quoted in Bloomberg BNA Article on Yeti Coolers Intellectual Property Lawsuits
- Artz, John S.
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Intellectual Property Attorney John S. Artz is quoted in the article “Yeti Enforces Trade Dress Over Rambler Cups as IPO Looms,” published by Bloomberg BNA.
Austin-based Yeti Coolers LLC, which announced plans for an initial public offering last year, has asserted its rights in more than 50 intellectual property actions in federal court since late 2014, according to Bloomberg Law data.
Another target of Yeti’s enforcement efforts, Ontel Products Corp., maker of Rocky Mountain-branded drinkware, tried to preempt Yeti when it heard from its retail customers that Yeti was threatening to sue them. Ontel filed a declaratory judgment action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, asking the court to declare that Rocky Mountain tumblers weren’t infringing. The court rejected that action, saying that hearing from customers about Yeti’s threats didn’t create a big enough fear of litigation to create a real case or controversy.
It was small consolation for Ontel that Yeti had actually sued it in Texas by the time the New Jersey ruling came down. “After we filed ours, we got sued, which was kind of our argument,” said Mr. Artz, Ontel’s lawyer.
Austin-based Yeti Coolers LLC, which announced plans for an initial public offering last year, has asserted its rights in more than 50 intellectual property actions in federal court since late 2014, according to Bloomberg Law data.
Another target of Yeti’s enforcement efforts, Ontel Products Corp., maker of Rocky Mountain-branded drinkware, tried to preempt Yeti when it heard from its retail customers that Yeti was threatening to sue them. Ontel filed a declaratory judgment action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, asking the court to declare that Rocky Mountain tumblers weren’t infringing. The court rejected that action, saying that hearing from customers about Yeti’s threats didn’t create a big enough fear of litigation to create a real case or controversy.
It was small consolation for Ontel that Yeti had actually sued it in Texas by the time the New Jersey ruling came down. “After we filed ours, we got sued, which was kind of our argument,” said Mr. Artz, Ontel’s lawyer.
Recent Insights
- October 27, 2025 Articles USPTO’s Proposed IPR Rule Could Strengthen Patent Validity and Reshape Enforcement Trends
- October 27, 2025 In the News Precedent Magazine published Daniel Waldman's article, "The Confidentiality Trap."
- October 22, 2025 Media Mentions Phil Smith was recently quoted in a Crain's Grand Rapids Business article, "Private equity and a robust market fuel West Michigan architecture M&A."
- October 20, 2025 In the News Dickinson Wright Recognized in The Globe & Mail’s 2026 Best Law Firms in Canada
- October 20, 2025 Articles Imagination Is Essential for Good Legal Defense
- October 17, 2025 In the News Paul Fransway and Ned Levitt Recognized in Lexology Index Franchising 2025 Report
- October 15, 2025 Media Mentions Angelique Neal was recently quoted in a Lawyers Weekly article, “6th circuit revives late tax petition on equitable tolling.”
- October 10, 2025 Recognition Congratulations to Kathleen Campbell Walker for being selected to the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Corporate Employment Lawyers guide.
- October 7, 2025 In the News Jing Liu, Ph.D. Recognized in the 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Edition