USTR Proposes New Section 301 Tariffs for Forced Labor Enforcement
- Heusel, Mark Clark, Jacob L. Wang, Hezi
- Industry Alerts
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
On March 12, 2026, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) initiated 60 investigations under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act of 1974 to assess whether the acts, policies, and practices of certain trading partners relating to forced labor import restrictions are unreasonable or discriminatory, and whether they burden or restrict U.S. commerce.
On June 2, 2026, the USTR announced significant findings and proposed trade actions following these investigations. Specifically, the USTR determined that all 60 investigated economies maintain practices that are actionable under Section 301.
USTR found that 54 countries have failed both to impose and effectively enforce a forced labor import ban. This group includes major trading partners, among others, such as:
- China and Hong Kong
- Japan and South Korea
- Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam
- United Kingdom
In addition, six countries were found to have existing prohibitions but inadequate enforcement, including Canada, Ecuador, the European Union, Indonesia, Mexico, and Pakistan.
Consequently, the USTR proposed imposing additional ad valorem tariffs on imports from all 60 economies, subject to limited exclusions, as follows:
|
10% Tariffs – Applicable to economies that have taken partial or formal steps, including:
|
|
12.5% Tariffs – Applicable to all other investigated economies that have not taken meaningful steps, including China, Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, and other countries not mentioned above. |
The proposed tariffs would apply broadly to all products from the investigated countries, with certain exemptions. A list of products exempted from the new Section 301 tariffs, identified by HTSUS subheadings, is provided in Annex A of the Federal Register. In addition to products listed in Annex A, the proposed new Section 301 tariffs would not apply to:
- Products already subject to Section 232 tariffs
- Informational materials (e.g., books)
- Donations and accompanied baggage
- USMCA-compliant goods from Canada and Mexico
- Certain duty-free textile and apparel articles under CAFTA-DR
The USTR is seeking public input on the proposed measures, including tariff scope, rates, and exclusions. Public hearings will begin on July 7, 2026. While it is widely assumed that the implementation of the new 301 tariffs is a replacement for the IEEPA tariffs struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court earlier this year, it is also expected that new attacks on the legitimacy of the tariffs are likely. Presumably, however, the Administration is counting on earlier cases affirming the Administration’s use of Section 301 to place tariffs on Chinese goods during President Trump’s first term.
As always, Dickinson Wright will continue to monitor developments in these investigations, including any final action taken by USTR, and will provide updates as additional guidance and implementation details become available.
Related Practices
Contacts
Recent Insights
- April 17, 2026 Industry Alerts CBP Announces April 20, 2026 Launch of CAPE Refund System for Import Duties
- April 06, 2026 Industry Alerts CBP Reports Continued Progress on CAPE System for IEEPA Refunds
- March 17, 2026 Industry Alerts CBP Provides Further Details on Planned IEEPA Refund System
- February 20, 2026 Industry Alerts Major Development: Supreme Court Decision on IEEPA Tariffs
- June 30, 2025 Industry Alerts QuickHits: DOJ’s FCPA Shift and Impacts on U.S.-China Operations
- June 06, 2025 Industry Alerts Recent U.S. – China Tariff Tensions Spark Investigations by Chinese Authorities
- April 04, 2025 Industry Alerts New World Order on “Liberation" Day with Reciprocal Tariffs and “Fantastic” Outcomes
- April 01, 2025 Podcasts DW FastTrack Episode 11: Understanding Sanctions - Current Trends Affecting OFAC
- February 12, 2025 Industry Alerts Public Safety Canada Releases Updated Guidance on Forced and Child Labour Reporting Rules