The Michigan Court of Appeals Internal Operating Procedures (a/k/a “the IOPs”)
- DeRosier, Phillip J.
- Articles
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
A version of this article was previously published in the Michigan Defense Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 2 (2024).
When it comes to handling a case in the Michigan Court of Appeals, one of the most useful resources may be the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures (commonly known as the “IOPs”). Although much of the information in the IOPs can be obtained from the court rules themselves, the IOPs, which are updated regularly, provide many helpful details about the Court’s internal processing of appeals. Here are some of the highlights:
- The IOPs explain the intake process for both claims of appeal and applications for leave to appeal, including the assigning of docket numbers, the processing of appeals involving multiple lower court case number or orders, and, in the case of appeals as of right, the Court’s initial determination of its jurisdiction.
- The IOPs provide details about the filing of interlocutory appeals, including how to seek emergency relief and a stay of proceedings. The IOPs also explain the process for submission of emergency appeals and related motions to hearing panels.
- The IOPs provide guidance for securing the transcript for appeal, including how the Court addresses late transcript orders, the late filing of transcripts, and situations when the transcript is not available.
- The IOPs explain motion practice in the Court of Appeals, including the various types of motions that can be filed and when they should be filed.
- Perhaps most useful for practitioners, the IOPs contain comprehensive information relating to the filing of briefs, including timing, form, and how to go about seeking an extension of time. The IOPs also explain the filing of adoptive briefs, joint briefs (e.g., appellant/cross-appellee or appellee/cross-appellant), supplemental authority, and amicus briefs (including the availability of a response).
- The IOPs explain how cases are placed on the Court’s calendar for oral argument, the ability of parties to advise the Court of scheduling conflicts, and how to seek an adjournment or disqualification of a judge.
- The IOPs explain the process for obtaining an audio recording of oral argument.
- The IOPs provide helpful information on the issuance of opinions and orders, filing motions for reconsideration, and taxing costs.
- Finally, the IOPs explain the various circumstances that can lead to the involuntary dismissal of an appeal and how to avoid them.
Related Practices
Contacts
Phillip DeRosier
Member and Appeals and Advocacy Practice Group Co-Chair
Detroit
Recent Insights
- Articles Effect of Approving the “Form and Content” of Orders
- July 14, 2026 In the News Kristen Hudson Named an Official Nominee for the Austin Business Journal’s 2026 Women in Business Awards
- June 10, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Recognized in Legal 500 United States 2026 Edition
- June 4, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Receives Top Rankings in 2026 Chambers USA Guide; 66 Attorneys Recognized as Leaders in their Fields
- June 03, 2026 Articles Orders Enforcing Agreements to Arbitrate—Final or Not?
- May 18, 2026 In the News Five Attorneys Join Dickinson Wright Troy Office as Members
- April 22, 2026 In the News Kim Ferreira Joins Dickinson Wright Toronto Office as a Partner
- April 22, 2026 Media Mentions Law Week Colorado recently featured James Rigberg in a Q&A article titled "5 questions with James Rigberg at Dickinson Wright."
- April 22, 2026 In the News Reuters recently published Sara Jodka’s article, “Your website is a satisfying target: What you need to know about pixel-tracking litigation in 2026.”