Litigation Law Newsletter, Volume 1, Number 3: COVID-19
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
March Focus
COVID-19
With all that is going on in the world, I wanted to provide you with a few key things to keep in mind regarding employers and employees.
As an employer, it is your duty to ensure that the workplace is safe. Although most businesses have been shutting down, the law as it currently stands does not prevent all businesses in Ontario from continuing to operate. Therefore, if you are continuing to operate, please keep the following in mind as an employer:
- Require employees returning from a high-risk area to immediately report such travel as well as any symptoms. Require such employees to work remotely for 14 days and only return once cleared by a medical professional.
- While layoffs are unfortunate and sad, be careful not to trigger constructive dismissals (i.e., making a substantial change to the terms of the employee’s contract without the employee’s consent, the employee has the option of treating his employment as having been terminated).
- Take the appropriate steps to ensure privacy of medical and health information.
- Consider that employees with a legitimate health and safety work refusal cannot be disciplined or dismissed.
Of late, the question that keeps arising is what happens if an employee refuses to attend the workplace because he fears that it poses a danger to his health and safety, even though the employee is not sick?
For starters, this situation is unprecedented. The legislation with the most applicability to the current situation is the Occupational Health and Safety Act (“the Act”). Under the Act, an employee can refuse to work if he believes the workplace poses a danger to his health or safety. Occupational illness is defined as a condition that results from exposure in a workplace to a physical, chemical, or biological agent to the extent that the normal physiological mechanisms are affected and the health of the worker is impaired. Occupational illness might include exposure to disease-causing bacteria and viruses, for example, or to chemicals or dust.
Until now, we are unaware of any worker who has attempted to rely on the Act as a basis for refusing to attend work because of COVID-19. However, with the current predicament changing rapidly, it won’t be long before this argument is made to the Courts on an urgent basis.
Recent Insights
- March 19, 2026 In the News David Wu Joins Dickinson Wright Silicon Valley Office as a Member
- March 19, 2026 Media Mentions Patrick Potter and Ashley Jericho were recently quoted in Global Restructuring Review, “Hong Kong proceedings denied recognition in Texas over US property requirements and COMI issues.”
- March 19, 2026 Media Mentions Matthew McLeod was recently interviewed for the Fello Agency blog, “Founder-Proofing Your Startup: Matthew McLeod’s Minimum Legal Foundation.”
- March 18, 2026 In the News Klien Hilliard Joins Dickinson Wright Seattle Office
- March 18, 2026 In the News Mark D. Marsden, Ph.D. Joins Dickinson Wright San Diego Office
- March 17, 2026 In the News Ruba Qashu Joins Dickinson Wright San Diego as a Member
- March 17, 2026 In the News Six Dickinson Wright Lawyers Listed in the 2026 Canadian Legal Lexpert® Directory
- March 17, 2026 In the News Thirty-Eight Dickinson Wright Clients Featured on LexisNexis® 2026 Top 100 Global Innovators
- March 17, 2026 Industry Alerts CBP Provides Further Details on Planned IEEPA Refund System