U.S. District Court Denies Class Certification in GE Microwave Case
- In the News
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
On September 19, 2016, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan ruled in favor of General Electric Company in denying the plaintiffs’ request to file a renewed motion for class certification. Dickinson Wright served as co-counsel to GE along with Hunton & Williams.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
Recent Insights
- November 17, 2025 Industry Alerts Congress Moves to Redefine Hemp: One Year to Reshape a Multi-Billion Dollar Industry
- November 13, 2025 Media Mentions Wendy Hulton was quoted in The Globe and Mail article, "CFIA monitoring U.S. move away from science-based decision making, documents show."
- November 13, 2025 Articles Enhanced Crackdown on Non-Compete Agreements
- November 12, 2025 In the News Andre Poles Recognized in Lexology Index Private Funds 2026 Guide
- November 11, 2025 In the News U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Rules in Favor of Inland Diamond Products Co. in Precedential Opinion
- November 11, 2025 In the News Sara Jodka's article, "Stepping into the AI void in employment: Why state AI rules now matter more than federal policy," was published by Reuters.
- November 10, 2025 Industry Alerts Preparing for CMMC: Navigating DoD’s New Cybersecurity Rules
- November 6, 2025 In the News Dickinson Wright Receives 214 Rankings in Best Lawyers 2026 Best Law Firms® Survey
- November 5, 2025 In the News Ashley Jericho Joins Dickinson Wright Troy Office