U.S. District Court Denies Class Certification in GE Microwave Case
- In the News
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
On September 19, 2016, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan ruled in favor of General Electric Company in denying the plaintiffs’ request to file a renewed motion for class certification. Dickinson Wright served as co-counsel to GE along with Hunton & Williams.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
Recent Insights
- July 2, 2025 In the News Susan Ramos Joins Dickinson Wright Phoenix Office
- July 2, 2025 In the News Five Dickinson Wright Attorneys Named to Forbes Inaugural Best-In-State Lawyers
- July 02, 2025 Media Mentions Jacob Frenkel was recently quoted in a Compliance Week article titled, “Experts: By narrowing FCPA enforcement, DOJ expands bribery threats, risks”
- July 02, 2025 Industry Alerts Washington State Expands Employee Access to Personnel Files
- July 01, 2025 Industry Alerts Texas Passes TRAIGA: What the New AI Law Means for Your Business
- June 30, 2025 Industry Alerts QuickHits: DOJ’s FCPA Shift and Impacts on U.S.-China Operations
- June 30, 2025 In the News Nine Dickinson Wright Attorneys Recognized in Nevada Business's Top Rank Attorneys 2025
- June 30, 2025 In the News Two Dickinson Wright Lawyers Recognized in 2025 Northern California Super Lawyers, One Named Rising Star
- June 27, 2025 In the News Thomas Vitale Joins Dickinson Wright Ann Arbor Office as a Member