U.S. District Court Denies Class Certification in GE Microwave Case
- In the News
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
On September 19, 2016, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan ruled in favor of General Electric Company in denying the plaintiffs’ request to file a renewed motion for class certification. Dickinson Wright served as co-counsel to GE along with Hunton & Williams.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
Recent Insights
- April 23, 2025 Media Mentions Hector Agdeppa was recently quoted in the CFO article, “A CFO’s guide to IP litigation, inspired by UGG’s trademark battle.”
- April 21, 2025 Media Mentions Frank Borger Gilligan was recently quoted in The Wall Street Journal, “Big Office Landlord Made $4 Million in Previously Undisclosed Payouts to Its CEO.”
- April 18, 2025 Industry Alerts Federal Agencies Ordered to Streamline Infrastructure Permits
- April 17, 2025 In the News Eight Dickinson Wright Attorneys Named 2025 Southwest Super Lawyers, Eight Named Rising Stars
- April 17, 2025 Industry Alerts Plugged In An EV Newsletter Vol. 3, No. 4
- April 16, 2025 In the News Shona Musimbe Joins Dickinson Wright Toronto Office
- April 16, 2025 In the News Matthew G. Koskinen Joins Dickinson Wright Ft. Lauderdale Office
- April 14, 2025 Media Mentions Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently quoted in a Vox article, “How worried should legal immigrants be about Trump’s deportations?”
- April 14, 2025 Media Mentions Marlene Pontrelli was recently quoted in an ABA Journal article, “When does a marriage become a legal trap?”