U.S. District Court Denies Class Certification in GE Microwave Case
- In the News
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
On September 19, 2016, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan ruled in favor of General Electric Company in denying the plaintiffs’ request to file a renewed motion for class certification. Dickinson Wright served as co-counsel to GE along with Hunton & Williams.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
In Robinson v. General Electric Company, Case No. 09-cv-11912, the plaintiffs originally sought to certify a nationwide class comprising owners of approximately 54 million GE-branded microwave ovens manufactured since 2000, plus state classes in California, Michigan and Ohio.
Earlier this year, the court denied plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed California class while holding the other putative classes in abeyance. The plaintiffs subsequently filed a renewed motion for class certification limited to a narrowed number of models which the court rejected in its September 19th opinion, denying certification as to all requested classes.
GE is represented in this action by Dickinson Wright lawyers Richard W. Paul and Kenneth J. McIntyre. The briefs on class certification are under seal, but the September 19, 2016 opinion is public and available here.
Recent Insights
- April 25, 2024 In the News Peter Westcott Joins Dickinson Wright Toronto Office
- April 25, 2024 In the News Elizabeth Luckenbach to Receive the 2024 Professionalism Award from the Oakland County Bar Association
- April 24, 2024 In the News Jessica Bartlett Rejoins Dickinson Wright Washington, D.C. Office
- April 24, 2024 Industry Alerts FTC Declares Employees Free from Most Noncompetes, But How Far Does the Ban Go and Will It Last?
- April 23, 2024 In the News The Federation of Regulatory Counsel’s (FORC) Journal of Insurance Law and Regulation recently published an article by Daniel Cotter titled, “IPAS Brewing in Illinois.”
- April 22, 2024 Webinars Corporate Transparency Act – What's All the Hoopla
- April 22, 2024 In the News Two Dickinson Wright Lawyers Recognized in Who’s Who Legal Corporate Immigration 2024
- April 22, 2024 In the News Jacob Frenkel was recently interviewed for CNBC news, “Sam Bankman-Fried sentencing underway: Here’s what you need to know.”
- April 22, 2024 Industry Alerts Keep Your Server Permit: No Drinking on the Job