Expediting Examination - Pre-Assessment Letters
DOWNLOAD PDF- Chumak, Yuri Tole, Sanjukta
- Industry Alerts
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
The Canadian Trademarks Office (TMO) has taken several steps to reduce the backlog of trademark applications awaiting examination that now exceeds 39 months for national applications.
The measures include the following:
- Fast-tracking applications that use statements of goods and services that are pre-approved by the TMO;
- Accelerating examination upon request of applicants in certain limited circumstances, with a focus on counterfeit goods and online enforcement;
- Hiring and training of additional trademark examiners;
- Reducing the availability of extensions of time in examination; and
- Decreasing the number of times arguments can be submitted against a given objection raised in examination.
Using pre-approved statements of goods and services in trademark applications may currently reduce examination wait times by several months. The Goods and Services Manual (GSM) has been expanded to include over 100,000 entries.
The TMO has recently launched a new automated review of all unexamined applications in Canada, resulting in “pre-assessment letters” being issued to applicants or their agents.
The review will identify if amendments to the statement of goods and services is potentially required, as well as flag any missing or improper Nice Classification information, or both. A pre-assessment letter will issue permitting an applicant to:
- File an amendment to its application to adopt a pre-approved statement of goods and services in replacement of the statement at issue or delete the goods and/or services at issue; and/or
- Address any misclassification issues.
Responding to the pre-assessment is voluntary; no formal deadline is set by which an applicant must respond to a pre-assessment letter.
If a pre-assessment does not uncover any potential flaws, the applicant will receive notification that the application will be examined at an accelerated rate similar to that of applications containing pre-approved statements of goods and services.
Rising Fees
The Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) has also started a new consultation on fee increases for patents, trademarks, industrial designs, integrated circuit topographies, and copyrights. CIPO plans to publish these changes within the next year formally and for them to take effect by January 1, 2024.
The fee increases are expected to be around 25% in most categories.
For example, government fees for filing trademarks will be going up almost 29% compared to current rates, as will fees to file Statements of Opposition and requests for trademark cancellation proceedings. Similarly, government fees for a patent application by a regular applicant will be going up 25%. The fee increase is concerning to patent practitioners as CIPO’s statistics show that the number of applications has been decreasing since 2018.
The Toronto IP team is actively contributing to this consultation and will be working with national organizations to provide relevant commentary. Given the changes, we encourage reviewing IP portfolios in Canada to take advantage of the current lower fees before these changes take effect.
Should you have any questions or concerns about pre-assessment letters, related fees, or other patent and trademark-related concerns in Canada, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Related Practices
Contacts
Recent Insights
- Industry Alerts CIPO Pandemic Response and Canada’s New Compulsory Patent Licensing Provisions
- Industry Alerts Canadian Trademarks
- Industry Alerts CIPO Pandemic Response: Update April 28, 2020*
- November 21, 2024 Industry Alerts Get Ready for Changes to USPTO Trademark Proceedings and Fees in January 2025
- October 28, 2024 Media Mentions John Krieger was recently quoted in the Los Angeles Times article, "The ‘Baby Reindeer’ case against Netflix could hinge on one line: ‘This is a true story’,”
- October 14, 2024 Media Mentions The San Diego Business Journal has quoted both Michael Hammer and Dr. Jing Liu in the article, “Drawn to San Diego for Life Science Practice.”
- October 11, 2024 In the News Andrea Arndt's article, "Patent Owners Beware: Expanded Jurisdiction Risks in Using Third-Party Platforms to Remove Infringing Listings," was published by IP Watchdog.
- October 11, 2024 Media Mentions Mike Hammer and Dr. Jing Liu have been quoted in the Law360 article, “Why Dickinson Wright Launched IP-Focused San Diego Shop.”
- October 10, 2024 In the News Inbound Logistics published Tripp Lake's article titled, "Protecting Supply Chain Trade Secrets."