Attorney Greg Gemignani Quoted in Article About Supreme Court Sports-Betting Case
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Attorney Greg Gemignani was recently quoted in an article entitled “Supreme Court Riddle: Who Voted To Hear The Sports-Betting Case?” published by GamblingCompliance.
The article focuses on the mystery surrounding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear New Jersey’s appeal of a federal sports-betting ban and how the court will rule on the case later this year. While many believe the decision to hear the case three years after the Supreme Court rejected the first appeal has to do with the makeup of the Court, other factors may have been involved.
“Other state issues such as gun laws, medical marijuana and sanctuary cities may have persuaded a mix of more than just four Supreme Court justices to vote to hear New Jersey’s sports-betting appeal,” according to Mr. Gemignani.
To read the full article, please click here.
The article focuses on the mystery surrounding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to hear New Jersey’s appeal of a federal sports-betting ban and how the court will rule on the case later this year. While many believe the decision to hear the case three years after the Supreme Court rejected the first appeal has to do with the makeup of the Court, other factors may have been involved.
“Other state issues such as gun laws, medical marijuana and sanctuary cities may have persuaded a mix of more than just four Supreme Court justices to vote to hear New Jersey’s sports-betting appeal,” according to Mr. Gemignani.
To read the full article, please click here.
