Dickinson Wright Attorneys Successfully Defend Client Against RICO Claim
- Stuckey, Jeffery V.
- In the News
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Dickinson Wright PLLC is pleased to announce that Attorneys Kathy Lang (Member, Detroit), Michelle Alamo (Member, Detroit), and Carmen Dorris (Associate, Detroit) successfully defended Accident Fund Insurance Company of America (AFICA) against a Federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Claim brought by a workers compensation claimant’s live-in girlfriend who was denied reimbursement for 24-hour attendant care services.
The plaintiffs filed their RICO claim in the name of the live-in girlfriend, thus raising the issue of whether a non-professional, unlicensed, non-family member attendant care service provider, such as a live-in girlfriend, has standing to maintain a claim under RICO when the injured worker does not have standing.
On January 23, 2017, Judge Arthur J. Tarnow granted AFICA’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing finding that the non-professional, unlicensed attendant care provider girlfriend had neither a legal nor contractual right to reimbursement and therefore, lacked standing to maintain a RICO claim. Along with the RICO claim, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claim under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act and for false imprisonment and entered Judgment on all claims in favor of AFICA. The team hopes that the court’s ruling on this novel issue will deter similar claims in the future.
Other members of the team representing AFICA were Joseph Fink (Member, Lansing) and Jeffery Stuckey (Member, Lansing).
The plaintiffs filed their RICO claim in the name of the live-in girlfriend, thus raising the issue of whether a non-professional, unlicensed, non-family member attendant care service provider, such as a live-in girlfriend, has standing to maintain a claim under RICO when the injured worker does not have standing.
On January 23, 2017, Judge Arthur J. Tarnow granted AFICA’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing finding that the non-professional, unlicensed attendant care provider girlfriend had neither a legal nor contractual right to reimbursement and therefore, lacked standing to maintain a RICO claim. Along with the RICO claim, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claim under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act and for false imprisonment and entered Judgment on all claims in favor of AFICA. The team hopes that the court’s ruling on this novel issue will deter similar claims in the future.
Other members of the team representing AFICA were Joseph Fink (Member, Lansing) and Jeffery Stuckey (Member, Lansing).
Contacts
Recent Insights
- December 06, 2024 In the News Thomson Reuters Practical Law Commercial recently published Ned Levitt and Richard Schuett’s article, “Key Franchising Considerations: Overview (Canada).”
- December 06, 2024 Video Dickinson Wright's Life Sciences Practice Group
- December 05, 2024 Media Mentions Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently quoted in the Law360 article, “Trump’s Immigration Plans Could Threaten Economic Security,”
- December 04, 2024 In the News Ralph Levy’s article, “Impact of Connelly Decision on Buy-Sell Agreements for Physician and Other Practice Groups,” was recently published in the Journal of Health Care Compliance.
- December 03, 2024 Media Mentions Amber Hughes was recently featured in The Wall Street Journal article, “5 Things to Do Now to Make Your Estate Simpler for Your Heirs,”
- November 22, 2024 Media Mentions Lee Petro has been featured in prominent media outlets, including Law360, Bloomberg, Communications Daily, and CNN where he shared insights on the potential regulatory landscape under the new presidential administration.
- November 22, 2024 Recognition Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently recognized in Mondaq’s Autumn 2024 Thought Leadership Awards.
- November 21, 2024 In the News Five Dickinson Wright Attorneys Recognized in 2024 Mid-South Super Lawyers
- November 21, 2024 Industry Alerts Get Ready for Changes to USPTO Trademark Proceedings and Fees in January 2025