Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- December 1, 2025 In the News Dickinson Wright Recognized by Leadership Council on Legal Diversity as a 2025 Compass Award Winner
- December 01, 2025 Articles Rising Scrutiny in Employment-Based Visas: What Employers Must Prepare For
- December 1, 2025 In the News Michael Hammer Named to Michigan Lawyers Weekly 2025 Managing Partners Spotlight
- November 26, 2025 Articles Michigan Supreme Court Amends Court Rules on Taxation of Costs on Appeal
- November 21, 2025 Conferences Dickinson Wright to Present at the Michigan–Japan HR Conference
- November 21, 2025 In the News Four Dickinson Wright Attorneys Recognized in 2025 Mid-South Super Lawyers, One Named Rising Star
- November 21, 2025 In the News Four Dickinson Wright Lawyers Recognized in Lexology Index Canada 2025
- November 21, 2025 Media Mentions Kristen Hudson was quoted in an American Bar Association Litigation Section article, "Online Shopping, Cookies, and Jurisdiction."
- November 19, 2025 In the News Thirty-Two Dickinson Wright Attorneys Named DBusiness Magazine 2026 Top Lawyers