Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- May 26, 2026 Industry Alerts Take Two (AI) Bills And Call Me In the Morning
- May 21, 2026 Media Mentions K. Lance Anderson was recently quoted in a Defense and Munitions article, “From the research lab to the battlefield and beyond.”
- May 20, 2026 Blogs When Founders Litigate the Wrong Case: How Ego, Reputation, and Technical Defenses Can Destroy a Winnable Fraud Defense
- May 18, 2026 Industry Alerts 3 Chapter 15 Rulings in 4 Days Reinforce the Integrity of U.S. Chapter 15 Administration
- May 18, 2026 In the News Five Attorneys Join Dickinson Wright Troy Office as Members
- May 15, 2026 In the News Investors Digest recently published Andrea Arndt’s article, “Is ‘Patent Troll’ Label Fading?”
- May 14, 2026 Blogs How to Get a Liquor License in Tennessee: A Step-by-Step Guide
- May 13, 2026 In the News Paul Bain and Ciara Halloran wrote the Canadian chapter, "The Legal Regulation of Art in Canada: Copyright, Moral Rights, and Cultural Property," for the international publication, Art Law: A Practitioner's Guide to Art Law Around the World.
- May 13, 2026 In the News Peiyao Zhang Joins Dickinson Wright Silicon Valley Office