Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- July 28, 2026 In the News Casey O’Neill Joins Dickinson Wright Silicon Valley Office
- July 27, 2026 Industry Alerts The FCC Looks Inside the Box: New Rules for Components and Online Marketplaces
- July 27, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Nashville Office Moves to 5 City Boulevard
- July 27, 2026 Media Mentions John Krieger was recently quoted in the Law360 article, “The Biggest Copyright Rulings Of 2026: A Midyear Report.”
- July 23, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Receives Top Rankings in Chambers 2026 High Net Worth Guide
- July 20, 2026 In the News Jing Liu, Ph.D. Shortlisted for LMG Life Sciences 2026 Americas Awards
- July 20, 2026 Media Mentions Stephen Montgomery was quoted in the NY Times article, “The Latest in the Uncle Nearest Whiskey Saga: Federal Fraud Investigations.”
- July 17, 2026 In the News Kimberly Bryant and Jay Campbell Recognized in 2026 Legal 500 City Elite
- July 17, 2026 In the News Alex Courtade’s article, “Clients Are Writing Emails With AI—So What Now?” was published by Law.com.