Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- October 7, 2025 In the News Jing Liu, Ph.D. Recognized in the 2025 LMG Life Sciences Americas Edition
- October 03, 2025 Industry Alerts Michigan's Wholesale Marijuana Tax: Preliminary Thoughts and Observations
- October 02, 2025 Upcoming Webinar: Political and Policy Advocacy with 501(c)(4) Organizations
- October 02, 2025 Recognition Congratulations to Leslee Lewis for being selected to the 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Real Estate Lawyers for the second year in a row.
- September 29, 2025 Recognition Congratulations to Monica Labe for being selected to the 2025 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global Real Estate Lawyers for the second year in a row.
- September 26, 2025 In the News Kaitlyn Elias and Michael Vogt recently published an article, “Permitting Renewable Energy Projects in Michigan: An Overview and Update on the New State-Level Permitting Process,” for the Oakland County Bar Association's LACHES Magazine.
- September 25, 2025 In the News Dickinson Wright Receives Top Rankings in 2026 Chambers Canada Guide; Four Lawyers Recognized as Leaders in their Fields
- September 25, 2025 In the News Kevin Seguin Joins Dickinson Wright Nashville Office
- September 24, 2025 In the News Colin Quinn Joins Dickinson Wright Phoenix Office