Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- January 09, 2026 Recognition Phillip DeRosier will be receiving the John P. Jacobs Award on March 19, 2026, at the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel Legal Excellence Awards.
- January 8, 2026 In the News Lexi Lauring Joins Dickinson Wright Detroit Office
- January 8, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Ranked Number Three in Midwest Real Estate News 2025 “Best of the Best” Report
- January 5, 2026 In the News Patrick Potter Joins Dickinson Wright Washington, D.C. Office as a Member
- December 29, 2025 In the News William Honaker’s article, “Do You Own Your Marketing?” was recently published in Candy and Snack Today
- December 22, 2025 Recognition Yuri Chumak has been recognized twice in the Client Choice Lexology Index rankings.
- December 19, 2025 Industry Alerts Marijuana Rescheduling Pending Despite New Executive Order
- December 18, 2025 Media Mentions Jacob Frenkel was recently quoted in a Financial Times Agenda article, "SEC Plans to ‘Take the Noose Off’ Boards in 2026."
- December 16, 2025 In the News Three Dickinson Wright Attorneys Named to 2026 Ohio Super Lawyers, Two Named Rising Stars