Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- November 10, 2025 Industry Alerts Preparing for CMMC: Navigating DoD’s New Cybersecurity Rules
- November 6, 2025 In the News Dickinson Wright Receives 214 Rankings in Best Lawyers 2026 Best Law Firms® Survey
- November 5, 2025 In the News Ashley Jericho Joins Dickinson Wright Troy Office
- November 05, 2025 Media Mentions Sara Jodka was recently quoted in a Business Insurance article, "Human monitoring of AI necessary to oversee hiring processes, limit discrimination claims."
- October 31, 2025 Media Mentions Bloomberg Law recently quoted Rachel Schaffer Lawson and Stephen Montgomery in the article, "Distilleries Navigate Solvency Issues Following Covid Sales Boom."
- October 30, 2025 In the News Darrell Windham Recognized in Legal 500 City Elite Austin
- October 30, 2025 In the News Dickinson Wright Receives Seven Rankings in Best Lawyers 2026 Best Law Firms® - Canada Survey
- October 30, 2025 Articles TikTok's Privacy Blunders: A Wake-Up Call for Business Owners
- October 30, 2025 Media Mentions Nicolette Taber was quoted in a Medscape Medical News article, “Where the Line Is: The Ethical Limits of Physician Investing.”