Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- February 4, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Earns Eighth Consecutive 100 Score in Human Rights Campaign Foundation’s 2026 Corporate Equality Index
- February 03, 2026 Media Mentions The Inter-American Dialogue’s Latin American Advisor quoted Mark High in the article, “How Will the USMCA Trade Talks Play Out This Year?”
- February 2, 2026 In the News Scott MacDonald and Nicholas Marler Join Dickinson Wright Seattle Office
- February 2, 2026 In the News Aleanna Siacon Named to Michigan Lawyers Weekly 2026 Up and Coming Lawyers
- February 02, 2026 Media Mentions Mark Shapiro recently spoke at a Toronto Maple Leafs press conference alongside Darryl Sittler.
- February 02, 2026 Blogs Just Another NDA? Why M&A Confidentiality Agreements Are Different
- January 29, 2026 In the News Dickinson Wright Ranked in the 2026 Edition of the WTR 1000
- January 28, 2026 Blogs A Smart Way to Plan for High State Income Taxes: The Nevada ING Trust
- January 27, 2026 Industry Alerts Colorado Bankruptcy Court Pushes Back on Chapter 11 Filings by Solvent Debtors