Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- July 15, 2026 In the News Paul J. Polansky Joins Dickinson Wright Austin Office
- July 15, 2026 Media Mentions Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently quoted in a Law360 article, “Top 5 Immigration Court Rulings of 2026: Midyear Report."
- July 14, 2026 In the News Kristen Hudson Named an Official Nominee for the Austin Business Journal’s 2026 Women in Business Awards
- July 14, 2026 In the News Sara Jodka’s article, “It reads your email, files your claims, and never asks permission — The privacy law of AI agents,” was published in Reuters.
- July 10, 2026 In the News James E. Tyrrell III’s op-ed, “The Supreme Court just handed the political parties their best day in a generation,” was recently published in The Hill.
- July 10, 2026 Industry Alerts Updated TPS Expiration Dates Announced by USCIS
- July 09, 2026 In the News Andrea Arndt’s article, “Digital Resurrection: No Simple Legal Script,” was recently published in Inventors Digest.
- July 8, 2026 In the News Julia Thibault Joins Dickinson Wright Denver Office
- July 07, 2026 Podcasts DW FastTrack Podcast Episode 14: Captive Corner: Understanding Insurance Pricing