Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- March 14, 2025 Media Mentions Paul Bain was recently quoted in The Globe and Mail article, “Art dealers, galleries face slowdowns as tariff threats sow confusion in North American market.”
- March 14, 2025 Events Leading the Way in Space Law: Dickinson Wright at Space Beach Law Lab 2025
- March 14, 2025 Media Mentions Sara Jodka was recently quoted in the SHRM article, “Make Inclusion an Operational Strategy, Not a Standalone Program.”
- March 14, 2025 Industry Alerts Plugged In: An EV Newsletter Vol. 3, No. 3
- March 13, 2025 In the News Five Dickinson Wright Lawyers Listed in the 2025 Canadian Legal Lexpert® Directory
- March 13, 2025 Recognition Congratulations to Kathy Zelenock for having her article, “Charging Forward! EV Charging Stations on Commercial Properties Create Real Estate Questions,” recognized as the Best Cutting Edge Article.
- March 12, 2025 In the News Brian Yu Joins Dickinson Wright Washington, D.C. Office
- March 11, 2025 In the News Three Dickinson Wright Lawyers Recognized in Chambers Global Guide 2025
- March 11, 2025 Media Mentions Kathleen Campbell Walker was recently quoted in the Newsweek article, “What to Know About the H-1B Program: Pros, Cons and Hiring Alternatives.”