Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- May 01, 2026 Industry Alerts DEA Final Order Creates Federal Pathway for Medical Marijuana
- May 01, 2026 Media Mentions Tripp Lake was quoted in an Information Week article, “Outsourcing contracts weren't built for AI. CIOs are renegotiating now."
- May 01, 2026 In the News Tripp Lake was recently featured in a Law Week Colorado Q&A article titled "5 questions with Tripp Lake at Dickinson Wright."
- April 30, 2026 Media Mentions Andrew Alvarado was recently quoted in a Houston Public Media article, “State hemp rules are currently blocked. A court will soon decide whether to extend the ban.”
- April 29, 2026 Blogs Section 168(n): A New Opportunity for Expensing Qualified Production Property
- April 28, 2026 Media Mentions Katherine VanderVeen was recently featured in a Law Week Colorado Q&A article titled "5 Questions with Katherine VanderVeen at Dickinson Wright."
- May 4 - May 6, 2026 Events Join Dickinson Wright at the Nevada Tax & Trust Conference 2026
- April 24, 2026 Industry Alerts Congratulations to our client, Hemp Industry & Farmers of America, on their victory.
- April 23, 2026 Industry Alerts Operational Planning for Hospitality Businesses in FIFA ’26 Host Cities