Lawyer Brian Radnoff Quoted in Canadian Lawyer Article on Legal Disciplinary Case
- Media Mentions
Want to get our alerts?
Click “Subscribe Now” to get attorney insights on the latest developments in a range of services and industries.
Lawyer Brian Radnoff was recently quoted in the Canadian Lawyer article “Case against Law Society of Ontario allowed to move forward”.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
A panel of Ontario Court of Appeal judges recently allowed the appeal of a lawyer who amended his claim that the Law Society of Ontario’s disciplinary process amounted to wrongful abuse of power. The case, Robson v. The Law Society of Upper Canada, will now proceed in Superior Court on the part of the appeal related to malicious prosecution and the question of what constituted malice.
Mr. Radnoff, a commercial litigator who also represents lawyers in disciplinary cases, says that such cases are difficult to make on the merits, even if they proceed past the pleadings stage.
“There are some circumstances – this perhaps is one of those cases – where you have to be very careful,” Mr. Radnoff says. “It is very unfair to the party to basically say you are bound by this obiter decision where you either only had a limited opportunity to make representations or didn’t make representations at all on this issue, and now you are bound by this. And you are guilty of professional [misconduct]. This is another one of those cases that shows where there is a fine line in terms of preventing people from relitigating what other judges have said in what could be obiter decisions.”
To read the full article, please click here.
Recent Insights
- August 29, 2025 Media Mentions Susan Ramos was recently quoted in a CNN Politics article, “Trump administration expands ‘good moral character’ requirement to become naturalized citizen.”
- August 29, 2025 Media Mentions Dorn McGrath’s and Michael Beckwith's article, “U.S. space operations in the gray zone,” was published by the Daily Journal.
- August 27, 2025 In the News Katie D. Franklin Joins Dickinson Wright Lexington Office
- August 27, 2025 Media Mentions Michael Hammer was recently quoted in a Law.com article, “'Toxic to a Culture?' Advanced Profitability Metrics Stoke Concerns, Even as Sophistication Spreads.”
- August 26, 2025 In the News Sean Story Joins Dickinson Wright Las Vegas Office
- August 25, 2025 Media Mentions Reuters recently published Sara Jodka’s article, “Telehealth's GLP-1 boom: balancing obesity care with HIPAA and state consumer privacy laws.”
- August 21, 2025 In the News 220 Dickinson Wright Attorneys Ranked in Best Lawyers in America®, Lawyer of the Year, and Ones to Watch 2026 Editions
- August 21, 2025 Industry Alerts One Big Beautiful Bill Act Expands QSBS Tax Incentives for Small Business Investment
- August 20, 2025 Industry Alerts Ohio Department of Development Updates QEP PILOT Construction Reporting Process